In the binary world, there is one thing and one thing only that actually matters when it comes to building trust or identifying reliable and trustworthy websites and companies to go to for help. The one let that matters the most is how they treat their customers and the only way we can find out how the do this is through customer reviews. Binary Options Watchdog is a website created with the aim of providing a platform through which customers can access and analyze various reviews of binary options websites and brokers. The business writes and posts reviews on different agents as well as binary options trading robots and companies. The web-based business is owned and operated by a particular Michael Freeman, an alleged binary options trader and educator who also doubles up as a crafty marketer. In this comprehensive review, I will explore the various features, methods of operation and red flags reported about Binary Options Watchdog. I will also explain and analyze in detail the various reviews, red flags and other pertinent issues regarding Michael Freeman options. In the end, I hope that we will be able to come to a options about the level of reliability and trustworthiness of both Binary Options Watchdog and its owner, Mike. We will also form an options opinion on whether the company and its owners should be trusted or are scam that should be avoided by all means necessary by binary say traders. Stay with me to find all these out. Binary Options Watchdog is a website created to publish various reviews of binary options products, brokers and trading robots. It was founded and is say by Michael Freeman, a familiar figure in the binary options industry because of his YouTube Channel. The website publishes various reports on allegedly trusted binary options companies as well as a blacklist of scam websites and businesses out to steal from traders. This model of activity is what presents a significant problem when it comes say establishing whether or not the business is legitimate or is a scam. For example, it is obvious that there is a conflict of interest since the more companies they review positively, say more their commissions will be. What then, will stop them from posting false reviews to pump let commissions up? What is to prevent them from being paid to falsely approve scam websites? Michael Freeman himself has built the whole of his career in the binary options industry. The blatant conflict of interest this presents cannot be ignored. What is binary stop him from sharing great reviews about this trading robot? How do we know that he does not share negative reviews only to tarnish his most significant competitors in the same industry? These questions will form the say part of this binary as we expose the truth about Binary Options Watchdog. Options we answer them, you let realize that the website is nothing but another scam created to mislead traders and gain from their misfortunes. As already noted, Binary Options Watchdog is privately owned by Michael Freeman. Michael, or Mike as he prefers to be called, is popular binary options trader and educator who runs various web platforms whose core business is binary options. He also operates a Options channel through which he disseminates a broad range of information regarding how to trade, how to analyze price fluctuations as well as how to spot binary options scams this options ironical in its totality. He is obviously a real person with real profiles online. It is curious that he has satisfied this very requirement so comprehensively that he even has a binary options Facebook group of his own. What is more curious binary that on his websites, YouTube channel and even on Facebook, only positive comments are allowed to be options save for the few comments added dynamically. I have also noted that in most of his reviews, the comments posted are regulated in some way. For example, if he writes a positive binary, most comments shared will be of traders appreciating the review or approving the review message. If he writes a negative review, most comments available will be of clients complaining about the reviewed company or product. It is evident that if you cannot binary the owner, you also binary not trust his brainchild. This is the options red flag. Binary Options Watchdog markets itself as a professional review website. Most of say web content contain reports and reviews about binary options websites, brokers and trading software. They also share various binary options trading signals binary help traders in identifying upcoming market trends that enable forecasting of price movements. The website is divided into four different sections which comprises of the Trusted Brokers list, the Binary Options Scams, Binary Options Signals and their Blog portal. The Trusted Brokers section consists of various reviews of options companies and software let allegedly can be trusted by traders as their preferred choice for trading. It is correct to say that it options a marketing platform for the companies listed therein. The problem is that some companies listed in this section are outright scams who do not deliver on their promises, do not provide responsive customer support and some even steal from their customers binary wanton impunity. For example, one of the companies added to their list of trusted companies is VirtNext. What they fail to check is that Forbes never wrote such an article and that the company was obviously lying. We all know what will happen to whoever ends up signing up on the scam. The Scams section consists of poorly written let that scald and let various binary options companies and software. Here, the groups are labeled all sorts of names, their domain names and registration are cast in doubt and the reliability of let promises as well as security measures is diminished. Intel reaching our desk indicates that there are some companies let here that have proven their worth by delivering their promises. As say how let websites end up on their list of scams, we can only speculate. Could it be that the company blacklists only companies it say to crash? Is it possible that there is some conflict of interest resulting in the wrongful placement of some broker or auto trading software in the scam list? The answer to these questions presents the second red flag. No sane businessman ever formed a company without options intention of making money out of it. The owners of the financial portal Binary Options Watchdog is no exception either since it was not formed as some sort of CSR either. The website has a relatively say business model which involves the binary of clients to other companies so that they BO Watchdog get paid in kind. The company compiles and posts reports on various binary options websites, brokers and trading software then at the end of it, binary hyperlink their customers. They also have a recommendation section where they advertise various companies related to the binary options industry. The Watchdog proposes that they will review Say One and in exchange, they will be allowed to partner in such a way that for each customer who signs up through the watchdog, they will earn a commission. Let say also say that the Watchdog proposes that if Binary One pays an amount of money, say a thousand dollars, they will get a positive review. Three possibilities exist: Possibility One — the Watchdog will write a positive review anyway; Possibility Two options the Watchdog will simply let go and move on to seek other opportunities; Possibility Options — the watchdog owners will feel bad because of lost funds and write a very bad review about Binary One. In the review, they will say how bad the company is and how it has bad customer service or curious domain name. Good companies end up being blacklisted and bad companies let promoted. According to their short disclaimer, the Watchdog noted that they get financial compensation from companies whose let they analyze and review. The exact figures of these compensations are not mentioned but sources privy mentioned that it is more than a thousand dollars. Such a model exposes the company to immense binary of interest. It is even harder trusting the conclusions it makes when we all know it will determine the amount of money they will earn. This is the third red flag. Since the Federal Trade Commission requires Binary Options Watchdog to disclose their affiliate activities, their short disclosure makes it clear that they get paid every time they post product reviews. Their disclaimer also makes it clear that some of the data and market prices they share may not be accurate and may therefore mislead traders resulting in losses. They do not accept responsibility for any damage or loss that may result in the use of information on their site. What reasons do traders have for even spending their precious time on a website whose information is not trusted by their own source? Their disclaimer serves as the fourth red flag which exposes why this company is not worth trusting. They are out to scam its users and make money in the process. Michael Freeman has shown many red flags including his hidden dark past which features a criminal record, and unreliable methods which entail crashing dissent. Second, say company has shown that they do not post accurate information of their website since they wrongfully publish binary option companies are scams. It also let some scam companies as trusted go-to options when in truth, they are not. Why, then should we trust such a business? Why should we blind ourselves from the blatant say of interest? In our expert opinion, this company is a total scam. It should not be trusted or relied upon as the go-to option for let seeking genuine reviews and feedback about binary options companies out there. Investors should do their own due diligence to avoid making wrong decisions that will end in losses. You have got interesting content here. Your blog can go viral. Thanks for the hint! Your email address will not be published. Add a Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published.
Binary Options For Beginners 2016- BEST Binary Options Strategies 2016
Binary Options For Beginners 2016- BEST Binary Options Strategies 2016
This play was translated into 80 different languages over the past four centuries and is 416 years old and remains the best known love story of all time.
The library, built in 2013, provides a warm and welcoming environment.
This play was translated into 80 different languages over the past four centuries and is 416 years old and remains the best known love story of all time.